Search for: "Michigan v. Warren" Results 101 - 120 of 209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2014, 7:13 am by John H Curley
Therefore, the trial court properly vacated the arbitrators' decisions and granted summary disposition in favor of plaintiffs.In County of Warren v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Jon Hyman
Supreme Court issued its first employment decision of 2014, Sandifer v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
It is important to give credit where credit is due; not to Prosser, not to Warren & Brandeis but to Chief Justice Marston who, in DeMay v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
FlynnDoes the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act presume that a certified patient can only consume marijuana by smoking herb, or can pot brownies do the trick? [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:48 pm by WIMS
Portland is directly across the Delaware River within 500 feet of Knowlton Township in Warren County, New Jersey. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
City of Warren, Michigan, (6th Cir., Feb. 25, 2013), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a holiday display put up by the city of Warren, Michigan in its civic center. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 8:37 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 185223, Sept. 26, 2012) and dismissed claims that an inmate was punished for continually singing gospel songs, and that he was denied his Bible for three days.In Warren v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:44 am by Jon Hyman
The Court handed down its opinion in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:08 pm by David Bernstein
It turns out that UT (unlike University of Michigan in the Grutter case) did not give preferences to Native Americans, but did give them to Hispanics. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Steve Hall
  And: Weeks’s ruling—the first invocation of the new Racial Justice Act—was the first step in repairing the damage done by one of the Supreme Court’s most notorious holdings: McCleskey v. [read post]