Search for: "Milan v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2019, 8:17 pm
" New York [v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
” Holder v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:17 am
Inc and Decision 7709/19 Reti Televisive Italiane SpA v Yahoo! [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:32 am
Case Name: USA v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 4:14 am
As thoroughly discussed by Enrico Bonadio on The Conversation, a few weeks ago the Milan Court of First Instance issued an interim ruling in favour of mysterious artist Banksy or, rather, the company that manages his IP rights (Pest Control Office). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
Patentlyo discusses the question if the United States Government counts as "a person who is not the owner of a patent" in case Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 10:47 pm
Google, or who debated the Blizzard v. bnetd DMCA case with me back in the day. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 10:42 am
The publisher's blurb says: This international and interdisciplinary Research Handbook brings together leading scholars and practitioners to discuss the state-of-the-art of ombudsman research. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 7:10 am
” United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:26 am
The Milan court sided with Carey: in 2012 it held that Gabibbo infringed copyright in Big Red. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 10:25 am
Golden v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
These cases, include BIC Leisure v Windsurfing International (1988), Amsted Industry v National Castings (1990), TP Orthodontics v Professional Positioners (1990) and Magna Electronic v TRW Auto Holdings (2015). [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 2:47 am
Judge Milan D. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:32 am
V. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
In a separate dissent, Judge Milan Smith—observing that “this dispute ceased being a typical employment dispute and metastasized into one of those cases that only Franz Kafka could love,”—argued that the majority’s conclusion was based primarily on a series of highly speculative future professional restraints that may or may not happen (Golden v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:05 am
It also ordered that the proceedings continue in order to determine the actual amount of the damage to be awarded to the claimants, also taking into account Spanish law with regard to ZARA ESPANA's activities.CommentThe decision of the Milan court represents one the first national applications of the CJEU ruling in Nintendo v Big Ben. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
Since 2009, Kiko has been accusing Wycon (previously known as Wjcon) of copying its concept stores before the Courts of Rome and Milan but, on those occasions, unsuccessfully. [read post]
