Search for: "Monroe v. State Bar" Results 101 - 120 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
  Arthur Miller – the civil procedure guru, not the improbable husband of Marilyn Monroe – is on the petition as Of Counsel. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
This raises the bar on whether a statement is sufficiently serious to be considered defamatory. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am by Jonathan Shaub
” Similarly, while president, Thomas Jefferson responded to a House resolution requesting information about the conspiracy against the United States involving Aaron Burr by providing all information relevant to Burr but withholding other names. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
With meticulous care and a deft blend of legal analysis and dramatic narrative, Alison LaCroix has raised the bar on showing us how much can be learned by a close study of neglected aspects of the long founding era. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57;  Tot v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:33 pm by lsammis
District Court in Minnesota as a reasonable balance between affording the defense bar access to the Source Code and protecting CMI’s proprietary interests and state security concerns regarding the breath alcohol testing program. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
In finding for the Claimant, Mitting J stated “…The impression given by the postings to the ordinary reader was a significant and distorting overstatement of what had in fact occurred. [read post]