Search for: "Morris v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 8:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jun. 19, 2018)JBT’s predecessor asserted Patent Act false marking claims, Lanham Act false advertising claims, and various North Carolina and Arkansas State law claims against Morris, its sole competitor in selling auger chillers to poultry processors in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:36 pm by Brian J. Brislen
  Rather,  “only those actions by the claimant which have the purpose and effect of causing the United States to pay out money it is not obligated to pay, or those actions which intentionally deprive the United States of money it is lawfully due, are properly considered ‘claims’ within the meaning of the FCA. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:59 am by Charlotte Law Library
Lyle Dennison, reporter for the SCOTUSblog (Supreme Court of the United States Blog), stated in his blog dated June 20th, 2011 that it appears that each woman in the class-action suit in Dukes v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:51 am by Steven Cohen
City of MorrisUnited States District Court – Northern District of Illinois – September 26th, 2016) involves injuries sustained during the arrest of the plaintiff (McKeon). [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 8:21 am by Elisabeth R. Connell
As we previously reported, Judge Morris applied the three-part test set forth by the Second Circuit in its 1987 decision in Brunner v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Thus, the measure was nearly identical to the ban in federal law that was struck down by the Supreme Court in January of last year in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]