Search for: "Mrs. Lilly"
Results 101 - 120
of 277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
Mrs Justice Rose is go go go in Lilly v Janssen stay applicationStays of proceedings are not easy in UK courts, as Janssen found out last week in Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences [2016] EWHC 313, where Mrs Justice Rose refused to stay Lilly's revocation and declaration of non-infringement (DNI) action brought against Janssen's divisional patent - EP (UK) 2 305 282. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:44 am
Mr Justice Arnold held the parent patent to be invalid on the grounds of insufficiency (see [2013] EWHC 1737) and that Lilly's product would have infringed had the patent been valid. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:19 am
As the AmeriKat was busy getting to grips with Mr Justice Arnold's decision in the latest Lilly v Actavis case (see here), she relied on the talented (and ever succinct) Eibhlin Vardy (A&O), to analyze the decision. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
Mr Justice Arnold handed down his decision in the latest Eli Lilly and Actavis battle concerning lung cancer treatment pemetrexed disodium, in Actavis v Lilly [2016] EWHC 234, and Annsley takes the floor to recount this romantic, patent story,**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 82 [week ending on Sunday 7 January] – PhD Student Seminar at CIPA | IP meets Antimonopoly law in Japan | German Federal Patent… [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:59 pm
Mr Justice Arnold seems to have heard your cries for help in handing down his decision in the latest Eli Lilly and Actavis battle concerning lung cancer treatment pemetrexed disodium. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:12 am
* Breaking News from the EPO - SUEPO officials fired, downgradedWith a heavy heart, Merpel reports that she has just learned that Mr Battistelli, President of the EPO, has just fired the current chair of SUEPO.* Mr Justice Birss shines light on experiments and scientific advisers in English patent litigationThe AmeriKat reports about the interim decision of Mr Justice Birss in Electromagnetic Geoservices v Petroleum Geoservices [2016] EWHC 27. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
.* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Lilly ADHD dispute (Part I)* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Eli Lilly ADHD dispute (Part II)Annsley reports on the brand spanking new specialist Patents Court judge Mr Justice Carr’s decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2015] EWHC. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Such was the story in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:24 pm
” So with that, Mr Justice Carr held the Patent valid and Lilly’s counterclaim for threatened infringement succeeded.Conclusion The plausib [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical [2015] EWHC 2973 (Pat), decided on 22 October by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales, is a decidedly unbifurcated ruling, being a full-blooded infringement-and-invalidity action running to 243 paragraphs. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 10:01 pm
Inside” and “Mr. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 2:15 pm
With increased activity regarding proposed federal trade secrets legislation expected next month and for the remainder of the fall Congressional session, Seyfarth Shaw’s dedicated Trade Secrets/Non-Compete group has created a resource which summarizes the proposed legislation, outlines the arguments in favor of and against the legislation, and provides additional resources for our readers’ convenience. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:22 am
” Today’s musical interlude is dedicated to Mr. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
After the Court of Appeal reversed the first instance decision of Mr Justice Birss, the very same Darren further reflects on it: wasn’t Birss J basically right? [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
.* A novel becomes a saga - Actavis v Lilly set to go on and onThe IPKat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
However, their fall-back position was that Mr Justice Birss was indeed correct - this Kat further wonders whether Smith & Nephew perhaps would have had more luck at the appeal if they had fully endorsed this aspect of Birss J’s decision.The Court of Appeal considered a number of UK and EPO cases. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In Human Genome Sciences Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 the Supreme Court reversed the findings of the High Court and Court of Appeal. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:00 am
Specifically, Mr. [read post]
