Search for: "Mullins v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The Spanish Supreme Court has ruled in favour of Google Spain on the right to be forgotten, which means that claims concerning the right to be forgotten should be submitted directly to Google Inc in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it will consider whether last Term’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
 This is the first time that any decision from outside the United States has ever appeared on our year-end best/worst lists. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: Writing for the blog of the National Conference of State Legislatures, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Luis v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm by Carlo Van den Bosch
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
  Thus, following Iskanian, employers across California hoped that this decision excluding PAGA from the FAA would be taken up and reviewed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
• The stated purpose of the corporation in the charter is “to continue the operation of an Episcopal Diocese under the Constitution and Canons of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:28 am by Gregg Fisch
  It explained that SB 1818 was enacted in response to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. [read post]