Search for: "Munoz v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2010, 4:55 pm
McConnell (who in addition to being a distinguished jurist is also an absolutely first-rate litigator) tries valiantly to make use of an obscure footnote in a 1990 case, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 7:17 am
Adler notes that the Court’s 1990 decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Professor Michael McConnell points me to United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:34 pm
See Munoz v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm
Each year, approximately 30,000 to 50,000 cases of hepatitis A occur in the United States. [read post]
Bank Board Minutes Admitted To Show Board Did Not Receive Material Loan Information Under FRE 803(7)
20 Jan 2010, 1:23 am
6th.admend.png In a bank fraud prosecution, bank board minutes were admitted under FRE 803(7) to show the non-existence of information; in particular, that the board did not receive material information about certain loan transactions, in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:12 pm
Munoz, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit determined that a district court could consider a defendant's background, characteristics and conduct, thus, a court may refer to a defendant's alienage. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:40 pm
" United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 1:44 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Sentence is remanded for resentencing in light of Amendment 709 to the United States Sentencing Guideline U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 19, 2009 US v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:36 am
The United States Supreme Court held in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
, (May 25, 2008).Frederick Mark Gedicks, Fundamentalism, Spirituality, and Church-State Relations in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:59 am
Per Munoz v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:03 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Prison Term Is Reduced Due to Retroactive Application of Guideline Amendments
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:43 am
Per Munoz v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:16 am
But the court’s ultimate justification, though it did not play it up as such, is this line it quotes from Munoz v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 3:59 am
For the reasons that follow, we hold that the district court applied an incorrect legal standard in determining that the children were habitual residents of the United States at the time of the alleged abduction. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 7:06 am
Munoz, 233 F.3d 1117 (9th Cir. 2000), and United States v. [read post]
