Search for: "N. Strickland"
Results 101 - 120
of 133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm
The Supreme Court set out the test of effectiveness in Strickland v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 3:00 pm
., Bridges had an argument with another guest, Andy Strickland. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm
BBT, LLC (212 & 311); CLAUDE BROUSSEAU & ANN MARIE DUGRE (303); E & N, INC. (103); JOSEPH FERRARO (211); RICHARD & JANE KISEL (205); LEONARD MARNELL (207); JAR ENTERPRISES, LLC (105 & 108); L. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
DiazDocket: 10-1264Issue(s): (1) Whether it is necessarily unreasonable under Strickland v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
The Racial Justice Act and the long struggle with race and the death penalty in North Carolina 88 N C Law Rev 2031 (2010). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:49 pm
Florida, 405 U.S. 427, 430 (1972): “[i]n some cases the properly admitted evidence of guilt is so overwhelming, and the prejudicial effect of the [erroneously admitted evidence] is so insignificant by comparison, that it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the improper use of the [evidence] was harmless error. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:28 pm
Perkins & Ronald N. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Department of Agriculture 14-275Issue: (1) Whether the government's “categorical duty” under the Fifth Amendment to pay just compensation when it “physically takes possession of an interest in property,” Arkansas Game & Fish Comm'n v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 5:56 pm
Strickland, 77 N.C. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
General Revenue Corp.Docket: 11-1175Issue(s): (1) Whether a prevailing defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) case may be awarded costs for a lawsuit that was not “brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment,” when the FDCPA provides that “[o]n a finding by the court that an action under this section was brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment, the court may award to the defendant attorney’s fees reasonable in relation to… [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:38 pm
See Medjuck, 156 F.3d at 920 n.2. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
S. 648, 657, n. 21 (1984). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
In Feds for Medical Freedom, the Biden administration argues that Munsingwear vacatur fundamentally turns on equity, and “[n]o principle of equity would support requiring the President to maintain the vaccination requirement, despite his determination that it is now unnecessary, merely to preserve the opportunity to ask this Court to review the Fifth Circuit’s erroneous decision. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Maryland, and that this failure prejudiced the defense; and (2) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that Wearry’s attorney provided ineffective representation at the guilt phase of trial under Strickland v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
Geoff Davis (R-KY) reps the area where Toyota's major N. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
Geoff Davis (R-KY) reps the area where Toyota's major N. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
Strickland, 420 U.S. 308 (1975), and Pierson v. [read post]
