Search for: "NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY"
Results 101 - 120
of 164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2009, 6:54 pm
(collectively, Citizens) charge Defendants United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), et al. with failing to adhere to procedures required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA) when they promulgated regulations that govern the development of management plans for forests within the National Forest System. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm
Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries). [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:41 pm
On February 9, 2010, the Southeastern Legal Foundation, a conservative “public interest” law firm filed a Petition for Review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s December 15, 2009, “Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
On the other side, defending the propriety of the appellate forum, are the federal government and several more environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council and the National Wildlife Federation. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
The Biden Administration proposed restoring parts of the National Environmental Policy Act. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:49 am
Environmental Protection Agency have this power, which flows from specific delegations from Congress. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 6:26 am
The United States, along with fellow-respondents the Natural Resources Defense Council and the National Wildlife Federation, argues that the rule does fall within the provisions that trigger direct appellate review. [read post]
9 May 2012, 8:08 am
Wildlife Federation v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 12:24 am
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 2:02 pm
United States, 2010 WL 569733 (C.A. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Jewell 15-367Issue: (1) Whether the provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) “displace” the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) or otherwise render NEPA analysis unnecessary, thus eliminating the requirement of environmental review when the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) adopts a designation of “critical habitat” that has the potential to significantly affect the human environment; and (2) whether Section… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 9:54 am
American Bird Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:48 pm
Federal defendants contend that the agency actions taken in relation to grazing on the MNF were not arbitrary and capricious and have not harmed protected steelhead. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
, which charged a conspiracy to smuggle Southeast Asian artifacts, including from Thailand and Cambodia, into the United States, beginning in 2004;United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
To satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), FERC was required to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”). [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) missed the statutory deadline to publish a final rule for its policy on biofuels, which are considered an environmentally friendly alternative to traditional fuels. [read post]
