Search for: "Nation Magazine v. US Customs Service"
Results 101 - 120
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am
The Office publishes regular revisions, as appropriate, to reflect changes in the law and/or practices, which customers may access, download, or print. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Court granted summary judgment to defendants because (1) online music service provider's automatic mix feature did not infringe patent; and (2) internet radio did not infringe patent.Paltalk Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at… [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 7:03 am
With last week's Supreme Court decision in King v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Curiouser and curiouser.Well, Conte is an end run around the heart of modern product liability, which was created - not just for California but for the nation - in Greenman v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Under the HIPAA Privacy Rule, Plans and other HIPAA-covered entities and service providers acting as business associates of the Plans are prohibited from using or disclosing individually identifiable protected health information unless the use or disclosure is expressly authorized by the Privacy Rule. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
Similar issues have been explored on our side of the border, with National Magazine highlighting some of the concerns raised by lawyers here about how our privacy is being compromised as well, focusing in particular on increased powers under Bill C-21, An Act to Amend the Customs Act and Bill C-23, Preclearance Act, 2016. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
On 17 May 2016, Sir David Eady heard application in the case of Monks v National Westminster Bank plc. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
The IP Court of Venice held that a work created by a lawyer for their client in the provision of legal services was protected by copyright law. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
National Federation of the Blind; Hurley v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Were we tempted to create this duty, the gentle tug of the First Amendment and the values embodied therein would remind us of the social costs.Winter v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Using devices to store and transmit body-related data has been commented on by CPO magazine. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
Citizenship & Immigration Services (“USCIS”). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:16 am
Directive 89/104 ... be interpreted as meaning that, where the proprietor of a registered mark ends its undertaking to a third party not to use that mark for certain goods and thus intends to recommence that use itself, the national court can none the less definitively prohibit it from recommencing that use of the mark on the ground that it amounts to unfair competition because of the resulting advantage to the proprietor of the publicity previously made for the… [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 12:07 pm
(He retired last year, after 20 years of service.) [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
With the Obama Administration construing the United States Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
Porsche AG: (Class 46), WIPO: Yell Limited v Yell.travel: domain name yell.travel to be transferred to Yell Limited: (Class 46), Some see rise in non-traditional trade marks; national registries not yet: (Intellectual Property Watch) Global - Patents Lower patentability standards – strategic responses: (IP Thinktank), IP Business Congress sees Finnish inventor become a millionaire: (IAM), Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for effectively analysing an invention and… [read post]
