Search for: "National Federation of Federal Employees v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
See, e.g., In re United Mine Workers of America Employee Benefit Plans Litig., 159 F.R.D. 307, 312 (D.D.C. 1994) (waiver of work product limited to materials actually disclosed, because the party did not deliberately disclose documents in an attempt to gain a tactical advantage). [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
Still, there are some California employment law aspects of last week’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) recently created a new webpage with helpful practical information to guide employers and employees about employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:39 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 10:05 am
Employees of the Venezuelan corporation, along with the Venezuelan National Guard, blockaded the equipment yards, and then-President Hugo Chavez issued a Decree of Expropriation. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm
However, banning noncompetes is inconsistent with the expressed will of the people, as evidenced by numerous failed efforts to do so in Congress and in the legislatures of some of the most employee-friendly states and cities in the nation. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 3:52 am
In the case, Sysco Minnesota, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 1:50 am
The United States should be right in there, and not just monitoring it, given as far reaching and serious as this case is. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:00 am
The NLRA is a federal law that governs labor relations for most private sector employers in the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:55 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31: Unions that give voice to public employees may no longer be able to effectively do their job, depending on how the Supreme Court rules. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:10 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., the United States Supreme Court held that an employee who orally complains about not being paid overtime is protected from retaliation by his employer. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:52 am
"These individuals are charged with defrauding education programs, with the assistance of public employees who abused their positions for personal gain," said United States Attorney, Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:52 am
"These individuals are charged with defrauding education programs, with the assistance of public employees who abused their positions for personal gain," said United States Attorney, Rosa Emilia Rodríguez-Vélez. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 10:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 11:50 am
Significantly, it suggested that an award of reinstatement, “conditioned upon [the employees’] presentation [of] compliant documentation to show that they are lawfully present in, and authorized to work in, the United States,” might be permissible. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 1:56 pm
” But Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson focused on the congressional intent behind federal employee designation of the technicians — who are state employees for some purposes, and federal employees when engaged in other functions: organizing, administering, instructing, or training of the National Guard; and the maintenance and repair of supplies issued to the National Guard. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:51 am
Pt. 5 12/10/21 21-588 (21A85) United States v. [read post]
