Search for: "National Labor Relations Board v. Lewis" Results 101 - 120 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 6:03 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The cases before the Supreme Court originated before the National Labor Relations Board, which had ruled that such agreements violate workers’ rights under the National Labor Relations Act to take collective action to ameliorate their working conditions. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:35 am by John Lewis
Greenwood.pdf a potential antidote for the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) decision in D.R. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
In June, the DOJ not only withdrew its representation of the National Labor Relations Board in a case pending before the Supreme Court, it also opposed the Board’s position in an amicus brief filed in NLRB v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm by John Lewis
The EAP, however, permits employees to file charges and participate in investigations before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and state or local anti-discrimination agencies, and did not compel employees to waive any rights they had under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) or prevent employees from filing unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm by John Lewis
The EAP, however, permits employees to file charges and participate in investigations before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and state or local anti-discrimination agencies, and did not compel employees to waive any rights they had under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) or prevent employees from filing unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). [read post]
21 May 2018, 10:01 am by Holland & Hart
Supreme Court ruled today that arbitration agreements requiring that an employer and an employee resolve any employment disputes through one-on-one arbitration do not violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:00 am by Liz Kramer
”* In contrast, Justice Ginsburg’s dissent frames the issue as “Does the [FAA] permit employers to insist that their employees, whenever seeking redress for commonly experienced wage loss, go it alone, never mind the right secured to employees by the National Labor Relations Act . . . [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
” In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the government’s recent “about-face” in Epic Systems “has created an extremely rare scenario: the Justice Department and National Labor Relations Board, a federal agency, will oppose each other in court”; he concludes that “[b]y all indications now, the case … looks like a 5-4 victory for employers. [read post]
29 May 2018, 5:49 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In a 5-4 ruling written by Justice Gorsuch, the Court concluded that neither the FAA's savings clause nor the National LAblor Relations Act (as interpreted by the National Labor Relations Board) renders such clauses unenforceable. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Jon Gelman
No 184 (2012) the National Labor Relations Board ruled that mandatory arbitration clauses prohibited Fair Labor Standards Act collective action cases because they interfered with protected concerted activity under 29 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:35 am by Joy Waltemath
The National Labor Relations Board has consistently rankled employers during President Obama’s eight years at the helm, proving a stalwart supporter of organized labor and ushering in change, in degrees both incremental and sweeping, to that end. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
The National Labor Relations Board could use its existing election machinery to facilitate employee choice of representative which could be an individual, a group of employees, an attorney, a labor union, or another workers’ rights organization. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:23 am
  The National Labor Relations Board has an authorized strength of five members, and three is generally considered to be a quorum to decide cases. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:59 am
Wilma Liebman (National Labor Relations Board): Reflections on an Aging Federal Agency1:30 p.m.-3:00 p.m.Part Seven. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:47 pm by Ryan Kunkel and Jim Shore
May 21, 2018) (consolidated cases), returns to the status quo that existed for decades until the Obama National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) reversed course in 2012 and held that employment agreements that require employees to individually arbitrate disputes violate the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). [read post]