Search for: "Nations 1st Communications, LLC" Results 101 - 120 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 1st District.Criminal law -- Guilty plea -- Vacation -- Failure of trial court to advise defendant of immigration and deportation consequences of plea -- Trial court erred in granting defendant's motion to vacate guilty plea on ground that state failed to carry burden of proving that plea colloquy informed defendant of consequences of plea -- Burden of proof was on defendant to prove that colloquy did not inform him of consequences of pleaTHE STATE OF… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
by Paul Bland, Claire Prestel, and Melanie Hirsch The consumer and civil rights communities are closely watching AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Introduction of Keynote Speaker   Donna Brazile Brazile & Associates, LLC   10:40 A.M. - 11:00 A.M. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Henley, Don – Henley, DeVore file reply briefs in ‘parody’ battle (Copyrights & Campaigns)   US Trademarks 50% successful with jus tertii defense: Golden Temple of Oregon, LLC v Wai Lana Productions, LLC and United Food Imports, Inc v Baroody Imports, Inc (Property, intangible) ‘Fraud and the TTAB: What hath Bose wrought? [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
No. 227, 84th Cong., 1st Sess., 53) A 2006 report on drug safety released by Institute of Medicine of the National Academies found that the FDA cannot ensure the safety of new prescription drugs because of inadequate funds, cultural and structural problems, and “unclear and insufficient regulatory authorities. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:55 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 By Cynthia Marcotte Stamer The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) has begun disclosing on its website the employer and other health plans, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates (Covered Entities) that report breaches of unsecured protected health information (UPIC) affecting more than 500 individuals as required by new rules enacted as part of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:17 am
Traffic Information LLC(Docket Report) District Court E D Virginia: Cookies-functional web browser was ready for patenting when initial draft of source code was logged into repository: Netscape Communications Corp., v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:25 am
    In April 2008, Integrative Medicine at Yale and Yale CME sponsored the 1st Annual Yale Integrative Medicine Scientific Symposium. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 9:25 am
    In April 2008, Integrative Medicine at Yale and Yale CME sponsored the 1st Annual Yale Integrative Medicine Scientific Symposium. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:35 am
1st Circuit: Individual Parties Must Be Named for D&O Coverage to Apply The National Law Journal The 1st Circuit ruled Thursday that companies cannot recover the cost of fighting lawsuits or administrative cases alleging wrongful director or officer conduct unless the cases name the individuals as parties. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Mercexchange LLC, 547 U.S. 388, 126 S.Ct. 1837 (SCOTUS 2006): Established test for granting injunctive relief in patent cases. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Brief amicus curiae of Association of National Advertisers, Inc. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) CAFC Judge Rader: ‘Stronger IP system allows countries to compete in world marketplace’ (PatentlyBIOtech) Professor Mossoff’s historical paper about patent thickets, patent trolls and patent pools: relevant today (IP Dragon) The balance between standards and patent regulation (IP Frontline) Patents in a bear market (IP Solutions)   Australia Full Federal Court: Commonsense approach to trade mark use and the beer/wine dichotomy confirmed:… [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Accepting the rule set forth in the EEOC's Compliance Manual, the Court concluded that "When an employee communicates to her employer a belief that the employer has engaged in . . . a form of employment discrimination, that communication virtually always constitutes the employee's opposition to the activity. [read post]