Search for: "Neuberger v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2011, 12:46 am
AL-JEDDA v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
In that case, Lord Shaw described how open justice was ‘a sound and very sacred part of the constitution of the country and the administration of justice. . .The principle is equally embedded into the framework of all common law systems; not least the United States, where, in 1791, it was enshrined as a constitutional right by the 6th amendment. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:22 am
This would put us at odds with every other civilised state. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
In the 1950s Leo Strauss had criticised the degree to which public debate in the United States had descended into what he described as “reductio ad Hitlerum“, whereby opponents of a policy would liken it to a fascist policy or label its proponents Nazis to score political points (regardless of the distinctions between the policy and those pursued by the Nazis). [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm
The Court considered R(M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) as the leading case on s.21(1). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:23 am
The UK had attempted to appeal the recent decision in Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
He goes on to discuss the now infamous hunting ban case, R (Jackson) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 11:01 pm
This language has been mirrored in a number of more modern legal sources, including Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, the 1984 United Nations Convention against Torture which 147 of the 192 members of the UN, including the UK, have signed up to (para 28) and the 8th Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Lord Neuberger did hold that dispossession in violation of Article 8 would be unlawful, but how would this work itself out in practice? [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
Abstract: This essay reads the public controversy surrounding Sonja Sotomayor’s nomination and confirmation to Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
Lord Justice Maurice Kay gave the only judgment and Lord Neuberger and Lord Justice Sedley agreed. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:04 pm
Rooney, Coulson, Hague: balancing privacy and expression Revisited and Updated: Strasbourg on Privacy and Reputation, Part 3 Defamation Damages: USA and England Compared Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information: Part 1: The European Convention Alastair Brett – as he leaves The Times, Lectures: Lord Neuberger on the balance between privacy and freedom of expression Libel Reform Debate: Part 1 “Burden of Proof” Case Law: Political Blog Libel Action Struck out… [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 11:38 am
(case recently noted by Jeffrey Neuberger at PBS/Media Shift) UMG Recording v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:15 am
Here the courts in England and Wales were struggling to ascertain the intended meaning of clauses of a licence intended to take effect in the United States, where the gap between a brand's profile-raising strategy for football (a.k.a. soccer) apparel and the manner of its execution could be measured in light years. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
’ (Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127, 205) The burden of proving the existence of Reynolds privilege is on the defendant (Ibid, 203) who must show that there was a real public interest in publishing the matter complained, that the inclusion of the words complained of was justifiable, and that in the circumstances publication was made responsibly (See, for example, Lord Neuberger in Flood v Times Newspapers [2010] EWCA Civ 804, at [31]). [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:08 pm
So all member state courts, however humble, can determine matters of EU law, a state of affairs which in Lord Neuberger’s words “has important consequences. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:00 am
British Airways Plc v Unite the Union [2010] EWCA Civ 669 (20 May 2010) - Read judgment Last month Unite won their appeal against an injunction obtained by British Airways in the High Court preventing their members from striking. [read post]
