Search for: "New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
The United States Department of Transportation estimates that human error accounted for 94% of these crashes. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
District Court for the District of New Jersey on March 16, 2010. [read post]
9 May 2008, 12:34 pm
§ 1407and Transfers Actions to District of Maryland Four (4) class action lawsuits were filed in Arizona, Florida, Illinois and New York against various defendants, including Michelin North America and American Honda Motor relating to the PAX “run-flat” tire system manufactured by Michelin and installed in certain Hondas and Acuras sold in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Mazda Motor of America, Inc., an 8-0 anti-preemption decision holding that the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208, which gave manufacturers a choice of installing either lap belts or lap-and-shoulder belts on rear inner seats of passenger vehicles, do not preempt state tort lawsuits premised on the manufacturer’s failure to install lap-and-shoulder belts.1. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 6:56 pm
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999), and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:59 am
Sky Drive Inc. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
General Motors Corp., 65 P.3d 956, 968-69 (Ariz. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Ford Motor Co. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
The cases are Coalition for Responsible Regulation Inc., et al. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 10:22 am
Toyota Motor Corp., 504 F.3d 1293 (Fed. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 9:06 pm
But, those petition filings were challenging the patents of a German based battery manufacturer, VARTA. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:55 am
(Park Place) operate a Mercedes dealership in Bedford, Texas, selling new and used vehicles. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
Diamond Innovations Inc (Docket Report) District Court New Hampshire: 30% royalty is not excessive even though it eliminates profits on infringing sales: Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 7:48 am
Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc., 12 Wash. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
United States Brass Corp., 333 F. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:29 pm
Buick Motor Co. (1916) 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am
Mazda Motor of America, Inc. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:34 pm
EPA and DOT worked closely with a broad range of stakeholders to develop the proposal -- including manufacturers, the United Auto Workers, the State of California, and consumer and environmental groups. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
General Motors, 2011 WL 52559, at *2 (S.D. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:25 am
Although the government requires auto manufacturers to have seat belt warnings in sight of those sitting in a car’s front seats, rear seat belt warnings are almost non-existent in vehicles sold in the United States. [read post]
