Search for: "New York City Dept. of Corrections"
Results 101 - 120
of 269
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2020, 3:00 am
Justice Dept. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
The law firm sues an incorrect governmental entity, in this case the City of New York rather than the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:31 pm
__________Concept Note: The emergence of a new strain of coronavirus, COVID-19, one of a more lethal strain of a class of virus that cause disease in humans, has had a profound effect on virtually all aspects of human activity. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 8:26 pm
Nor was it was unreasonable.The record contains substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's finding that Zaic is entitled to a compensatory damages award of $5,000 (Executive Law § 297[4][c][iii]; Matter of Framboise Pastry Inc. v New York City Commn. on Human Rights, 138 AD3d 532, 533 [1st Dept 2016]; see Matter of New York City Tr. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Justice Dept. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Zarda brought a claim in the Eastern District of New York alleging sex stereotyping in violation of Title VII and sexual orientation discrimination in violation of the New York Human Rights Law. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The New York City Correction Officers' Benevolent Association [Petitioner] filed an Article 78 petition to challenge a determination by New York City Board of Collective Bargaining [BCB] which concluded that New York City Department of Corrections [DOC] and the City of New York [City] did not commit an improper practice under the City Collective… [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
The New York City Correction Officers' Benevolent Association [Petitioner] filed an Article 78 petition to challenge a determination by New York City Board of Collective Bargaining [BCB] which concluded that New York City Department of Corrections [DOC] and the City of New York [City] did not commit an improper practice under the City Collective… [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
"* See Walton v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 8 NY3d 186, quoting Matter of Best Payphones, Inc. v Department of Info. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 1:37 pm
"* See Walton v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 8 NY3d 186, quoting Matter of Best Payphones, Inc. v Department of Info. [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 1:37 pm
"* See Walton v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 8 NY3d 186, quoting Matter of Best Payphones, Inc. v Department of Info. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 3:57 am
Environmental Control Board of the City of New York, 171 A.D.3d 623 (1 Dept. 2019) [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
” At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[t]he decision was notable for an exchange about the court’s attitude toward precedent. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 32 NY3d 556The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02875.htm [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Liberties Union v New York City Police Dept., 32 NY3d 556The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_02875.htm [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:09 pm
When: July 12th, 2019 (full day) Where: Cardozo Law School, New York City Submissions: Please send your name, current affiliation, and paper proposal to Tracey Begley at trbegley@icrc.org. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Although the date of appraisal must be the correct date of valuation, the appraiser may normally apply knowledge learned after the value date. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
** Citing Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, the Appellate Division observed that "Even where an arbitrator has made an error of law or fact, courts generally may not disturb the arbitrator's decision".The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_00340.htm [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:45 pm
In the first case to reach the trial stage, the US Southern District Court in New York has completed oral hearings. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:51 am
West 108’s statement of the law is correct. [read post]
