Search for: "Nichols v. Best"
Results 101 - 120
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:54 pm
In McPhatter v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:11 am
” Nichol v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
The Mischon de Reya website also has a post “ICO Code of Practice sets out best practices for data sharing“. [read post]
College Football Predictions for FBS Week 3 2012 by SportPundit and the Yards Per Play System YPPSYS
10 Sep 2012, 12:12 pm
May the best team win. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
De Niz Robles v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:35 pm
Nichols, 932 So. 2d 1067, 1074 (Fla. 2006). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:35 pm
Nichols, 932 So. 2d 1067, 1074 (Fla. 2006). [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Drug manufacturers must adequately warn physicians of the potential side-effects of their prescription drugs; thereafter, the physician, with his special knowledge of the patient's needs, assumes the burden of presiding over the patient's best interests.Id. at 472.The more recent case (and another of Bexis' PLAC amicus projects) is Kennedy v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
” (Hays Plc v Hartley [2010] EWHC 1068 (QB) at [62]). [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:15 am
Manson, Graham v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
In Nichols v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Debiasing hindsight bias is generally considered very difficult.[4]Instructions to “ignore the ex post knowledge” are useless.[5]The best strategy is to withhold the knowledge of the outcome from the decision maker, but this may not be feasible for obviousness assessments. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 10:49 am
Yesterday, I blogged about the lawsuit by Marc Rotenberg, former head of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, against Politico and Protocol, over a story that discussed Rotenberg's positive COVID test result, and Rotenberg's not immediately informing his staff about the test. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:36 pm
See Letter from Senators Kaine, King, and Coons to Rob Nichols (Apr. 9, 2020). [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 3:50 am
Copyright also protects the combinations of elements of the book to the extent that they are improperly appropriated (a good case for reference is Nichols v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
This culminated in the famous Terry v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Simply stated, what motivates much public interest regulation is a simple desire by some here in Washington to tell the American people what’s best for them. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution protects “right of the citizens to express freely their convictions and opinions”; whilst Article 40.3.2 provides that the “State shall … by its laws protect as best it may from unjust attack and, in the case of injustice done, vindicate the … good name … of every citizen”. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
As anticipated, and affirmed in Economou v de Freitas [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (see our blog here), the new section 4 defence is being interpreted broadly in line with the principles of the common law ‘Reynolds’ privilege (although there remains some debate between practitioners as to the level of importance to be attributed to each of the old ‘Reynolds criteria’ – Lord Nicholls’ checklist for good practice – in view… [read post]
