Search for: "OJ Basics" Results 101 - 120 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2015, 6:39 am
The most onerous provisions of the Regulation on due diligence and user compliance - Articles 4 (obligation to exercise due diligence to ascertain that genetic resources and traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources which they utilise have been accessed in accordance with applicable access and benefit-sharing legislation or regulatory requirements), 7 (obligation to declare compliance with due diligence obligation on receipt of funding and provide evidence of compliance at the final… [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm by Jelle Hoekstra
Furthermore, in accordance with the case law (T 939/92 OJ EPO 1996, 309, point 2.6.2 of the decision), reasonable predictions of relations between chemical structure and biological activity could be taken into account while assessing inventive step. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 11:48 am by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) Due to the press of a deadline for something else, I am not able to comment as fully as this all deserves, but I wanted to flag this morning’s editorial in the Washington Post, essentially defending and, in some ways, extending the Obama administration’s position on targeted killing, whether using drones or human teams, including American citizens under certain circumstances. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 2:24 pm by Kenneth Anderson
by Kenneth Anderson Oh heck, one final comment about the Texas International Law Journal discussion of the model air and missile warfare manual, which does run to Gaby Blum's article and discussion here at OJ. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
., R 112 EPC 1973; R 164) therefore changed with the coming into force of the EPC 2000, as explained in the remarks to the new rule published by the EPO (see OJ EPO 2007, Special Edition 5, 256), “New R 164 simplifies the procedure, and the opportunity to have multiple inventions searched within the framework of one application will be limited to the international phase. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
These rules are enacted pursuant to the EPC (see A 23(4) and R 12(3)) and are binding on the BoA (Article 23 RPBA). [5] The basic principle relating to the conduct of appeal proceedings is to be found in Article 12(1) RPBA, which states that: “(1) Appeal proceedings shall be based on (a) the notice of appeal and statement of grounds of appeal, (b) any written reply of any other party and (c) any communication sent by the BoA and any answer thereto filed pursuant to directions of the… [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 8:14 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Disclaiming subject-matter not in the application-as-filed led to G 1/03 already quite some years ago and is well-documented in many later decisions as well as in the Guidelines - strict conditions, which can basically only work out well if there is only one Art.54(3) EPC prior right document with a  single, clear disclosure. [read post]
10 May 2017, 12:23 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The basic principle of the Comvik approach is that only technical features can contribute to inventive step; but all technical features potentially do so.12. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:10 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Simpson, 103 Cal.Rptr.2d 492 (2001), is Ron Goldman’s parents’ wrongful death claim against OJ Simpson. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 11:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Additionally, the court in R v JAB, 2002 CarswellOnt 3241, [2002] OJ No 3755 further stated that a “sexual purpose” can be inferred by the court from looking at from the “circumstances of the situation, including the nature of the touching and any words or gestures accompanying the act”. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:48 am by Dáire McCormack-George
The question which now arises is what link, if any, exists between the right to work, which must be understood as the foundational and most basic right related to work, and other, derivative rights in EU law. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:02 am by Jeff Gamso
  Still, it's maybe where we should begin, because Kristoff's basic claim isn't just that the guy is innocent. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:18 am by Michael Oykhman
A basic example would be if you provided the police with information, you honestly believed was accurate, even though it is later determined that it was not. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 11:02 am by Kenneth Anderson
His basic tactic has been to delegitimise the amnesties that often accompany (and make possible) transitions from dictatorship or civil war to democracy. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by Kenneth Anderson
I have pointed out in earlier blog posts at both Volokh and OJ that Libya is an important marker of operational targeting law. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 8:35 am by Hull and Hull LLP
 And then he looks at some case law and one particular case he cites in his decision is Molodowich v Penttinen and the citation for that is 1980 OJ No. 1904. [read post]