Search for: "Officer Olmstead"
Results 101 - 113
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2011, 11:17 am
In so doing, they overruled the Supreme Court’s 1928 decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 9:02 pm
Prison Reform and Olmstead April 13, 2021 | Lynn McDonough Scholar argues that a key disability rights framework could support prison reform or even abolition. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:37 am
The reality is that, no matter how the case is decided, it will not dramatically change the ability of officers to place these devices on cars in any individual case. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
Schmitz, Allain Legal, Ltd, North Olmstead, for Appellee City of Findlay Union’s and Hill’s Argument The stipulated issue in this case is whether there was just cause to terminate Sargent Hill, and if not, what was the appropriate remedy. [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:00 am
Trump, though, offers nothing of interest to the constitutional theorist save as a baleful reminder of the failure, contrary to the assurances set out in Federalist 68, that the Electoral College would serve as a guardrail against the election of a terrible demagogue to our highest office. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
In a 6-3 opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the court ruled in Olmstead v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
The Olmstead Supreme Court decision means that Medicaid Waivers will be expanded. [read post]
16 May 2021, 9:10 pm
Lynn McDonough, Managing Editor April 13, 2021 | Prison Reform and Olmstead | Scholar argues that a key disability rights framework could support prison reform or even abolition. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Now it is the Office for People With Developmental Disabilities. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (HHS) urging it to address “persistent” organ transplant discrimination against people with disabilities. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
And the use, as evidence in a criminal proceeding, of facts ascertained by such intrusion must be deemed a violation of the Fifth.I'm always saddened by the fact that Brandeis wrote that ringing paragraph not for the Court in Olmstead v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm
Background For more than eight decades — that is, at least since its ruling in 1928 in Olmstead v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Incluso, en adelante se reconocería su apellido, como verbo informal: “We’re going to bork him”, definido en la jerga de D.C. como “obstruct (someone, especially a candidate for public office) through systematic defamation or vilification“. [read post]
