Search for: "Officer Oxley"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2010, 6:18 am
In the paper, Increased Disclosure Requirements and Corporate Governance Decisions: Evidence from Chief Financial Officers in the Pre- and Post-Sarbanes Oxley Periods, which is forthcoming the Journal of Accounting Research, I examine how the new internal control disclosure requirements mandated by SOX affect annual corporate governance decisions regarding CFOs. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 8:11 pm
Board committees meet more often post SOX and Director and Officer (D&O) insurance premiums doubled. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:03 pm
US Department of Labor finds Bank of America in violation of Sarbanes-Oxley Act whistleblower protection provisions. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 4:00 pm
George Diaz, a shareholder of Digimarc Corporation, a supplier of "secure personal identification systems", sued several of the company's officers and directors for breaching fiduciary duties and violating section 304 of Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
Sept. 30, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that no private right of action exists under Section 304 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:52 am
The language relating to whistleblower protection specifically states that it applies to public companies, or officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors or agents of such companies. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:00 am
Office Depot, LLC, the Eleventh Circuit adopted an employer-friendly “totality of the circumstances” standard for evaluating whether a plaintiff’s belief was “reasonable. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:00 am
Office Depot, LLC, the Eleventh Circuit adopted an employer-friendly “totality of the circumstances” standard for evaluating whether a plaintiff’s belief was “reasonable. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm
Feb. 3, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in a case of first impression, held that the whistleblower provision in Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:37 pm
Feb. 3, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in a case of first impression, held that the whistleblower provision in Section 806 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 6:16 pm
Based on the Sarbanes Oxley Act, the PCAOB must review accounting firms that audit 100 or more public companies once a year.The PCAOB inspection staff performed an inspection of KPMG from May 2006 to December 2006 doing field work at KPMG's National Office and at 17 of its approximately 90 U.S. practice offices. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 3:25 pm
Attorney's Office in the Western District of Washington is prosecuting the case." [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
If Congress didn’t mean to protect those employees, they say, it wouldn’t have prohibited retaliation by “any officer, employee, contractor, subcontractor, or agent” of “such [public] company. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
The Free Enterprise group says that violates a clause of the Constitution giving the president the power to appoint government officials except for certain instances involving inferior officers. [read post]
12 May 2019, 8:36 am
Thank you to the staff of the Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Economic and Risk Analysis and the Offices of General Counsel and Chief Accountant for your hard work on this proposal. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
We know that Sarbanes-Oxley offers protections to employees at public companies, but does it also protect employees at mutual fund companies? [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:58 am
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act created significant new civil and even criminal liabilities for officers and directors whose firms have inadequate internal controls or improper financial disclosures. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 6:14 am
”Sarbanes-Oxley’s whistleblower protection applies not only to publicly traded companies, but also to their officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors and agents. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 5:13 am
Not the hand-wringing over the reputedly high costs of Sarbanes-Oxley, just the fact that not much else seems to be going on. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 1:25 pm
It is a good vehicle to use because it will be in the annual report and is subject to Sarbanes-Oxley Section certification by the company's chief executive and financial officers.The CD&A, which is modeled on the MD&A, is envisioned as a narrative principles-based overview explaining material elements of the company's compensation for named executive officers. [read post]
