Search for: "Officer Wilkins" Results 101 - 120 of 385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2008, 2:16 pm
Walter Wilkins is the current United States Attorney in South Carolina. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:50 pm
Judge Douglas Wilkins sentenced him to a sentence of 10 to 12 years in prison, to be followed by five years of probation, according to a statement from Ryan’s office. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 12:06 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The opinion was joined by Judges Wilkins and Walker, each of whom also wrote a separate concurring opinion. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  It turns out that telling the difference between hemp and marijuana is as difficult for K9 officers and novel field tests as it is for human officers and forensic analysts. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 10:05 am by Orin Kerr
The magistrate judge crossed off the part about the warrant being executed at any time, making the warrant a daytime warrant: Now we get to the ruling: Judge Ginsburg, joined by Judge Wilkins, holds that the magistrate judge’s time limitation is binding. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:49 am by Steven Boutwell
According to the database of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), Swift has filed several trademark applications to register catchphrases from her 2014 album 1989. [read post]
6 May 2008, 12:00 am
Shortly after Samekiea turned down Wilkins's offer to pay her for sex, he became hostile towards her and fired her. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 2:00 am by mes286
Wilkins 11:30-11:45 AM – Break 11:45 AM-12:45 PM – How to Prepare Lawyers for 21st Century Crises? [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 2:00 am by mes286
Wilkins 11:30-11:45 AM – Break 11:45 AM-12:45 PM – How to Prepare Lawyers for 21st Century Crises? [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 4:37 am
Shortly after Samekiea turned down Wilkins's offer to pay her for sex, he became hostile towards her and fired her. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:21 am by Stephen Gillers
Matter of Wilkins (Ind. 2002), where a lawyer's brief "wonder[ed]" whether the court ignored the law and facts to reach its intended result. [read post]