Search for: "Ohio v. United States Environmental Protection Agency"
Results 101 - 120
of 171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
” The Ukrainian Ambassador to the United States is here tonight. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
United States Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 12:51 pm
Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 12:57 am
In Sutcliffe v Secretary of State for Education [2024] EWHC 1878 (Admin), Pepperall J commenced his judgment as follows: “[1]. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
United States Dep’t of State, 347 F. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
United States Dep’t of State, 347 F. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether the Environmental Protection Agency correctly issued a permit allowing discharges from a copper mine into a water body identified as impaired by the state of Arizona. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (Clean Air Act) Led blue state amicus brief in Sebelius v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 11:51 am
Raimondo) Put on hold the Environmental Protection Agency’s “good neighbor” plan to minimize air pollution that crosses state lines (Ohio v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), for example, has focused on ESG by investigating and taking action against companies that tout business practices such as consideration of environmental sustainability, but fail, in practice, to live up to their claims. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
As the Ohio complaint states, “In sweeping terms, [the Rule] purports to extend federal regulatory jurisdiction over broad swaths of the country, including vast areas within the States of Ohio and Michigan, that in no way constitute navigable, potentially navigable, or interstate waters—even in various instances reaching land that is typically dry. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 6:26 am
Kovner, assistant to the U.S. solicitor general (Art Lien) As described in my preview, the case hinges on a provision of the statute, 33 U.S.C § 1369(b)(1), which specifies seven actions by the Environmental Protection Agency that are reviewable directly in the courts of appeals. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States had already banned the app. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
An error in one of this term’s opinions provided a stark illustration of the costs of the Court’s lack of expertise: In the case dealing with the Environmental Protection Agency—Ohio v. [read post]
