Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 101 - 120
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
That means summer is over and time to re-focus on good compliance and ethics. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:50 am
Theeyyyyy’re heeeeere! [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:34 am
Here's the deal: Section 406 is a relatively obscure provision of Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 4:17 am
The gist of the article is that: MPs are considering changes to data protection laws that would make chief executives directly responsible for keeping the public's personal information safe and make the improper use of data a criminal offence.With the smell of Sarbanes-Oxley in the air, this is something to keep an eye on if you're in the UK. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
Since 2002, we’ve seen Sarbanes-Oxley, Dodd-Frank, higher and sometimes passing votes on a wide variety of shareholder proposals, and rapid growth in corporate efforts to speak with investors. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 1:56 am
Today's Wall Street Journal notes: Six members of the Paw family, each listing the house at 41 Shelbourne Ave. as their residence, have donated a combined $45,000 to the Democratic senator from New York since 2005, for her presidential campaign, her Senate re-election last year and her political action committee. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:11 am
What is needed is a re-establishment of confidence and trust. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
In re Sapient Corp. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:59 am
But by focusing narrowly on the many symptoms of regulatory dysfunction it may well prevent the re-occurrence of those events and circumstances that led up to the 2008 collapse. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:00 pm
Because last week was hot for re-regulation, I promised a summary of what I saw. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 6:08 am
I think what they're saying is that IT practitioners care about their effectiveness and making IT better, but they don't care about compliance the same way compliance and audit people care. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 4:21 am
This is interesting in that ten years ago, politicians, Ambassadors, businesses, audit firms, etc. from the EU vehemently opposed Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm
[E]ven [if the public sat in the available space in the back of the courtroom], they're going to be seated about six feet behind the second row of jurors, and I'm not—I'm just not comfortable with that. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
We are discussing In re Citigroup. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 9:01 am
No. 07-51350 (In re World Health Alternatives, Inc., Bankr. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 11:16 am
Sarbanes-Oxley has forced an additional layer and cost that many firms simply don’t wish to incur. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:40 pm
We’re happy to announce that Epstein Becker Green’s Whistleblowing & Compliance Law Blog has joined our blog. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:40 pm
We’re happy to announce that Epstein Becker Green’s Whistleblowing & Compliance Law Blog has joined our blog. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:19 am
I support today’s [Oct. 14, 2021] action to re-open comment on the Dodd-Frank Act rule regarding clawbacks of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 6:55 am
The evolving trend here is not only the frequency and depth of engagement, but also a more fundamental re-thinking of the nature of relationships with shareholders and the role that these relationships play in facilitating long-term value creation. [read post]
