Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2022, 3:30 pm
Bd. v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:40 am
" (United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm
A whistle blower document regarding product safety at a plant that manufactured infant formula linked to a deadly, ongoing outbreak provides damning information against Abbott Nutrition, the maker of Similac and other popular formulas that have been recalled in relation to the outbreak. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 4:14 pm
Fund v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Further, placing disclosures in filings also benefits investors because there are more controls around those disclosures, with a framework required from Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Current proposals include: (i) imposing a mandatory “cooling-off” period of 120 days for officers and directors, and 30 days generally, between when a plan is adopted or modified and when trading can commence; (ii) requiring directors and officers to personally certify to the company that they are not in possession of material nonpublic information at the time of adoption or modification of a plan; (iii) providing that the affirmative defense under Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) does not apply… [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am
The paragraph containing the specific statutory language in question, paragraph (c), was added to an already existing §1512 as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 6:26 am
Peregrine, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, on Monday, December 20, 2021 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Audits, Boards of Directors, Corporate fraud, External auditors, Financial regulation, Internal auditors, PCAOB, Sarbanes–Oxley Act, Securities regulation Corporate Implications from COP26 Posted by Lee Anne Hagel and Kilian Moote (Georgeson) and Harry Etra (HXE Partners LLC), on Monday, December 20, 2021 … [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 4:59 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, December 3, 2021 Tags: Accounting standards, Foreign issuers, Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, International governance, PCAOB, Sarbanes–Oxley Act, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation SEC’s New Approach to No-Action Requests for Shareholder ESG Proposals Posted by Era Anagnosti, Maia Gez, and Scott Levi, White & Case LLP, on Saturday, December 4, 2021 … [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 6:06 am
Adams (University of Oxford), Vanitha Ragunathan (University of Queensland), and Robert Tumarkin (University of New South Wales), on Monday, November 29, 2021 Tags: Board communication, Board dynamics, Boards of Directors, Decision-making, Disclosure, Outside directors, Sarbanes–Oxley Act, Securities regulation, Special committees Recent Shareholder Activism Trends Posted by George Casey, Scott Petepiece, and Lara Aryani, Shearman… [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
” In a working paper, Steven Salop, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and several coauthors discussed the impacts of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 7:32 am
Moody v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 6:06 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
“Sherron, even if it’s the last $10,000 you have, you have to use it to hire an attorney. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is seeking an unspecified amount of damages, including aggravated damages, from Ms Rubaashini Shunmuganathan, a Malaysian who wrote an article published on sociopolitical website The Online Citizen about the 38 Oxley Road saga. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 6:08 am
Robert Brown, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, on Friday, March 12, 2021 Tags: Accountability, Accounting, Accounting standards, Audits, Bebchuk v. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 7:05 am
Totten v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:00 pm
My bottom line: If the Supreme Court decides California v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:11 am
At other times, the Court has expanded Sarbanes-Oxley (extending its whistleblower protections to employees of contractors in Lawson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:08 pm
In one lawsuit, Dozier v. [read post]
