Search for: "P. v. Booker"
Results 101 - 119
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2007, 2:40 am
Booker, 542 U.S. 220 (2005), an incongruent pattern of caselaw has developed among those federal circuits that have considered whether Burns v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:47 am
Beyond that, however, the court points out that "'[p]ost-Booker caselaw confirms Husein's understanding that family circumstances can form the basis of either a Guidelines-authorized departure or a non-Guidelines, § 3553(a)-based departure, also known as a variance. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 1:50 pm
P. 32(h) for sua sponte upward departures does or does not apply to Booker variances. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
Id., p. 3. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
SalinsJohn P. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 11:59 am
P., if they are considering imposing a sentence above the now advisory guideline range, even after the Supreme Court's Booker decision which rendered the guidelines advisory rather than mandatory. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:56 am
" As AL&P notes here, the "analysis is disappointing, since it just refers to pre-Booker caselaw. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 10:46 am
In US v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:54 pm
US v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
Here is the abstract:Soon after the Supreme Court in Blakely v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 3:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 2:22 pm
" Slip p. 9. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 9:41 am
In doing so the Court noted that under U.S. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2006, 1:44 pm
The United States Sentencing Commission has released a Report on the Impact of United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2006, 10:23 am
" Foreman, Slip Op. at p. 5. [read post]
10 Jun 2005, 5:37 am
In a Booker remand in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2005, 3:29 pm
From the 7th Circuit we get United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
No. 04-86-P-H,(D.Me. [read post]
