Search for: "P. v. Mai"
Results 101 - 120
of 19,787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 5:00 am
P. 15– 16. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
We wish to take this opportunity to look back on the eventful journey that the European Union and the United Kingdom have embarked on in judicial cooperation since Brexit (I.) as well as to venture a look ahead on what may be expected from the prospective collaboration within and perhaps even alongside the HCCH system (II.). [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:56 am
“Professional shortcomings or disagreements as to litigation strategy that do not involve intentional false statements in the context of litigation may sound in legal malpractice, but [*2]not in attorney deceit” under Judiciary Law § 487 (Urias v Daniel P. [read post]
16 May 2024, 2:09 pm
— Laurie Voss (@seldo) May 14, 2024 — Dylan Gibbswith Alexandra Son, Ethan Russell, Michel Hajjar, and Evan DysonTODAY'S DOCKET6-min readNegligent bylaw enforcementHospital vaccine mandatesContinuing encampmentsUnionized warehousesLacklustre expertsNEGLIGENCEOttawa on the hook for Uber crushing competitionMetro Taxi Ltd. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:38 pm
R. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:27 am
See Cellco P’ship v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:04 pm
LAW & DISORDER Performing Arts Division May 15, 2024 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: • A National Ban on Non-Compete Agreements • Paid v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 12:11 pm
ref=broadbandbreakfast.com at p. 4. [read post]
14 May 2024, 12:11 pm
ref=broadbandbreakfast.com at p. 4. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Under CPLR 3026, "[p]leadings shall be liberally construed" and "[d]efects shall be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced" (Matter of Augostini v Bernstein, 172 AD3d 1946, 1947 [4th Dept 2019]).Accordingly, the matter is remanded for further proceedings, including a determination of whether respondent's answer was properly served.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST… [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Under CPLR 3026, "[p]leadings shall be liberally construed" and "[d]efects shall be ignored if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced" (Matter of Augostini v Bernstein, 172 AD3d 1946, 1947 [4th Dept 2019]).Accordingly, the matter is remanded for further proceedings, including a determination of whether respondent's answer was properly served.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST… [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
For more information, visit spencerfane.com 1 40 P.3d 1267, 1270 (Colo. 2002) 2 433 U.S. 186, 207 (1977) 3 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945) 4 Int’l Shoe, 326 U.S. at 316 (quoting Milliken v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:39 am
The May 8 ruling in Moser v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am
Salamone v Deily & Glastetter, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31569(U) May 3, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 160104/2022Judge: Shlomo S. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:55 am
” Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
