Search for: "P. v. Mays"
Results 101 - 120
of 19,751
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
The New York Civil Liberties Union, Amicus Curiae, The New York City Bar Association, Amicus Curiae.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Frank P. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am
UIPL 20-21, p 4-5[,] issued May 5, 2021. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:12 am
P’ship v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:45 am
New trialR. v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:00 am
5/7/1873: Chief Justice Salmon P. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:23 am
P. 5.2(a)(3), may apply to some first-year college students, but Doe was an adult when he filed this suit. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:00 am
PÉNAL (DROIT) — preuve pénale. [read post]
3 May 2024, 11:22 am
Sater, 155 P.3d 437, 441 (Colo. [read post]
3 May 2024, 10:53 am
In the case Jones v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am
According to the minutes and PRs from the first three Board meetings, the EC is currently finalising the draft Delegated Act on Transparency Reports (likely out in May 2024) and the draft Delegated Act on Data Acces (draft for consultation in May, and the final adoption planned for July 2024). [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Easterbrook and Diane P. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:25 pm
See page 107 of FDA’s 1st Quarter FY2024 MDUVA V Report (here). [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:22 pm
In an opinion spanning all of two pages, the district court granted Chevron deference to an OCC determination that banks may offer the economic equivalent of S&P 500 index funds. [read post]
2 May 2024, 10:39 am
" (Complainant, p. 3). [read post]
2 May 2024, 8:08 am
Diaz v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm
LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:00 am
Despite its length, the Guidance conspicuously omits any reference to last fall’s landmark decision in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:01 am
From Doe v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am
ReputationThe Court began by noting that although market share was a relevant factor, there was no requirement for a mark to be known by a specific percentage of the relevant public, nor for its reputation to cover all the territory concerned, so long as that reputation exists in a substantial part of that territory (QUARTODIMIGLIO QM, T-76/13 EU:T:2015:94).Furthermore, in order to establish whether a mark has a reputation, an overall assessment must be carried out of the evidence adduced by… [read post]