Search for: "PHILLIPS v. CHAMBERS"
Results 101 - 120
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 7:54 am
Historian Kim Phillips-Fein describes how “many who read the memo cited it afterward as inspiration for their political choices. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Allowing NML Capital’s appeal, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Clarke, Mance, Collins and Walker) held that it was entitled to do so. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 pm
In Bryan v UK the European Court stated: 37. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
In R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (MR Pakistan) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) the Supreme Court determined an important question of principle regarding the nature of the relationship between the Upper Tribunal and the High Court, namely the circumstances in which decisions of the Upper Tribunal are open to challenge in judicial review proceedings. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
Indeed as Lady Hale said in her judgement [93], “We have not so far failed to follow a decision of the Grand Chamber. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
Phillips, No. 11-0148/MC, the issue concerns what evidence the prosecution must present to prove the service discrediting element. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
Supreme Court's recent decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lord Phillips reiterated, as [58], that “the HRA does not have retroactive effect”, also that its interpretation ought to mirror that of the Convention. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am
As the sub-heading of Gill Phillips’ Guardian piece puts it a “Two tier system is being created as rich male stars take advantage of privacy protection“. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm
The trial judges in Campbell v MGN and Douglas v Hello! [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
In the words of Lord Phillips, it is the “cause of action formerly known as confidence”. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:38 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:37 pm
Phillips long ago described the purpose of an IME: “…to put the parties on a basis of equality” or, as it is commonly offered in chambers, to level the playing field. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
In Shevill v Presse Alliance ([1996] AC 959 and [1995] ECR I-415) it was held that publication of defamatory material in this jurisdiction is a “harmful event” for the purposes of Art. 5(3). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
It was recently considered by the Supreme Court in Spiller v Joseph ([2010] 3 WLR 1791), where Lord Phillips summarised the constituent elements of the defence as follows: (a) The comment must be on a matter of public interest. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm
” (Hays Plc v Hartley [2010] EWHC 1068 (QB) at [62]). [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm
White v. [read post]
