Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:12 am
On examining the authorities relied upon in the Court of Appeal (R v Ngyuen [2008] EWCA Crim 585 and R v O’Dowd [2009] EWCA Crim 905), the Court did not consider that there was any clear definitive statement on the issue now raised. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:19 pm
Accordingly, as long the police provide a coherent presentation of the defendant's important rights - the right to remain silent, that anything you say can be used against you, the right to have a lawyer present , and if you cant's afford one, to have one appointed by the Court - the standard will be met. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
In Binder v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:28 am
Motorola MobilityThe strategy of coupling an ITC proceeding with an analogous patent infringement suit is precisely the tack taken by Apple, Inc. in trying to maintain its hefty US market share for the iPhone by precluding the importation of competing goods. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
Connor v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 12:37 pm
He was, more precisely, charged with one count of harassment by means of an electronic communication. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am
It would be surprising to see the criminal provisions of the statute have an even lower standard for liability. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
That's the rule in Darnell v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
This focused much of the argument on figuring out just what the pleading standards are after Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:09 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:25 am
Gunter, 462 F.3d 237 (3d Cir. 2006), which set forth the following three-step process that district courts must use for sentencing: (1) Courts must continue to calculate a defendant's Guidelines sentence precisely as they would have before United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 2:34 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 9:36 am
One way to address these questions is to argue that the taste of cheese lacks precision and objectivity on intrinsic grounds, whereby the thing-in-itself fails to meet the standard. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 3:37 am
Such a finding would be too speculative and too likely to be used by courts as a shortcut for a causation inquiry. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:16 pm
” The broader claims are not expressly limited to the particular statistic used, while the dependent claims require alternatively require “indirect standardization” (Claim 25) or “indirect standardization” (Claim 26) of the weighting. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 6:29 am
Editor's Note: The following post comes to us from Jonathan C. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
It’s unclear precisely how the assailants used Model Mayhem, but the court merely says that they “used the website to lure [Doe] to a fake audition. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:24 pm
It can make a huge difference for unpublished works, for example; indeed, it was virtually dispositive in the Harper & Row v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 5:30 am
Circuit went ahead and decided Browning-Ferris Indus. v. [read post]
