Search for: "PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS" Results 101 - 120 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2011, 8:28 am by Dan Taglioli
In response to an emergency motion by proponents of the ban, the court granted a stay of US District Court Chief Judge James Ware's September 19th ruling [JURIST report; order] that granted the unsealing of the Proposition 8 trial video recordings. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 5:08 pm by lawmrh
”) Also take note, for example, of the decision in the California Proposition 8 gay marriage ban and the “Motion to Vacate Judge Walker’s Judgment Against Prop 8 is Denied. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The two gay couples who challenged Proposition 8, joined by media groups, urged its public release, but Proposition 8′s backers vigorously opposed that. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:55 pm by Administrator
  The federal judges may use California’s approach to guide their own decision about whether the Proposition 8 proponents have the “standing”  – or legal authority – to appeal the unfavorable decision they received last year in federal district court, where former Chief Judge Vaughn Walker ruled that Proposition 8 violated the U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am by William Eskridge - Guest
Finally, the briefs filed by the Proposition 8 proponents have been strikingly unable to tie the exclusion of same-sex couples to any neutral state interest. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:51 pm by Brad Pauley
Brown, S189476:  This proceeding arises from the federal constitutional challenge to Proposition 8, which outlawed gay marriage in California. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am by gstasiewicz
Former Governor Schwarzenegger and current Governor Brown have both refused to defend Proposition 8 in court, prompting proponents of the initiative to seek to intervene as defendants (Kristin M. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:57 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In briefs (here and here) filed with a federal District judge in San Francisco, the officials argued against overturning the decision last August to nullify Proposition 8. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court’s January 2010 order blocking public TV broadcasting of the trial on the constitutionality of the Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage is a total ban, so the videotape of the trial must remain sealed permanently, the proponents of the marriage measure argued on Thursday. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Backers of California’s Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage filed the final written arguments on Monday in the California Supreme Court, on the question of whether they have a right under state law to defend their measure in court when state officials refused to do so. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The couples contended that the proponents of the marriage ban were trying to shield from public view their efforts to defend in court the discrimination they sought in Proposition 8. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:12 am by Lyle Denniston
The Proposition 8 supporters are to file their reply brief by April 18. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
For the Constitution in 2020 conference on The Future of Equality.Douglas NeJaimePopular accounts and media commentary on the federal suits challenging the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and California’s Proposition 8 focus largely on the inevitable march toward marriage equality.Implicit in such accounts is a claim about the impact of favorable court decisions on the LGBT rights agenda.After a district court victory in the Massachusetts DOMA case and the more recent… [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
[JURIST] Proponents of Proposition 8 [text; JURIST news archive], California's same-sex marriage ban, on Monday urged the Supreme Court of California [official website] to allow them to defend the measure [brief, PDF] when state officials refuse to do so. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:18 pm by Lyle Denniston
Beginning their effort in the California Supreme Court to salvage their legal defense of the state’s ban on same-sex marriage, the proponents of Proposition 8 on Monday urged the state court to let them stand in for state officials who refuse to defend the ban. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm by Amanda Beck
The question of who can defend a ballot measure on appeal is important because two California administrations have refused to support Proposition 8. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm by Amanda Beck
The question of who can defend a ballot measure on appeal is important because two California administrations have refused to support Proposition 8. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Schwarzenneger -- the challenge to the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8 that bars same-sex marriage-- the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals certified to the California Supreme Court the question of whether under California law "official proponents of an initiative measure" have, under state law, a sufficient interest to give them standing to defend the constitutionality of the initiative when the public officials refuse to do… [read post]