Search for: "PS v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2011, 11:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
During this appearance, the attorney for the child stated, without submitting any evidence in support of her comments, that David was a special needs child and, as such, would not receive the services as provided for by PS 329 pursuant to his Individual Education Plan at his school in Tennessee. [read post]
22 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm by Bill Marler
There were 35, or 17 percent, that were V. alginolyticus, and 26, or 13 percent that were V. vulnificus. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
PS: Here is another link about increased lien filings (Thanks to Scott Wolfe for pointing this out). [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
These Ps didn’t suffer concrete harm and lacked standing to sue. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm by Howard Knopf
The Supreme Court of Canada was very clear about this back in 2004 in the CCH. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 4:18 pm by Randy Barnett
in Comstock may come back to haunt them in McDonald v. [read post]