Search for: "Packer v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2019, 12:03 pm by Bona Law PC
The team was unique in that it was owned by more than 500 local shareholders, similar to the ownership structure for the Green Bay Packers. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 2:19 pm
”—reflecting growing concerns about digital sovereignty and state practices of enclosure, fragmentation, and governance. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:55 am by admin
In the case Miguel Torres, S.A. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Zoe Stern
A state judge overturned Georgia’s ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, ruling that it violated Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am by Wolfgang Demino
Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992).In support of its argument that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to find lack of unfair surprise or prejudice, Hunters Mill primarily relies on Fox v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess, Inc… [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:09 pm by David Post
[Not the political kind, the real kind, the stuff you get from pigs] The Supreme Court has a pretty interesting, and potentially very important, "dormant commerce clause" case before it this term—National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]