Search for: "Page v. Board of Adjustment" Results 101 - 120 of 251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Brandes, titled" Stare Decisis, Precedent and Dicta, appears in the March 2020 issue of the New York State Bar Journal, Vol.92, No. 2 at page 36. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) jointly prepared the 5,828-page project level EIR, defining the project as a project-level EIR for the proposed resource management plan and conservation plan project components. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
When you pinpoint cite to a quote, you should cite to this paragraph number rather than to any page number. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Having adjusted Star’s temporarily triumphant defensive perspective, Smart then alerts Star to a serious Rule 506(b) noncompliance issue: Speed’s social media posts. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am by admin
Fletcher’s guts – all over the newspapers:   On Tuesday [February 15, 2011 – Ed.], the board filed a 237-page response in State Supreme Court that denied Mr. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
"  (EU Corporate sustainability reporting (disclosure touches on environmental matters; social and employee aspects; respect for human rights; anti-corruption and bribery issues; diversity on board of directors)). [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
As we await Thursday's oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
Public Facebook Profiles A number of cases in Canada have already admitted photographs or other information posted on a public Facebook page as evidence relevant to issues raised in the litigation.24 In one case, the discovery of photographs of a party posted on a MySpace page was the basis for a request to produce more photographs that were not posted on the site.25 In Kourtesis v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The consultant affirmed the suitability of a class 23 exemption, and in May, the Board approved the exemption and the sheriff’s request. [read post]