Search for: "Page v. Wright" Results 101 - 120 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
A brand’s IP, consumer protection and marketing strategies may be separate documents but they are inextricably connected.Technology support and AI tools are super helpful for monitoring BUT should always be used in conjunction with human intervention.Enforcing brands on social media platforms is important for protecting brand value, protecting the consumer against confusion, fraud, including fake or infringing support pages, accounts, profiles, advertisements, products and… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 7:53 pm by Orin Kerr
“If James Watt made more law than Lord Coke,” says the author in a moment of unwarranted exhilaration, “then the Wright Brothers outdid James Watt” (p. v); it is hardly convincing proof of this to find the cases on air law referring to such old friends as Gibbons v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda:     THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto     Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020)    July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing these comments. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 2:55 am by Walter Olson
‘But not everything is redressable in a court.'” [Sixth Circuit, Crosby v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:21 am
Rosenberg of The McCormack Firm in his Boston ERISA & Insurance Litigation Blog Supreme Court preview: Baze v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiff showed, prima facie, that at the time of the filing of that petition the defendant knew or should have known of the existence of those causes of action, and the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to that prima facie showing (see Wright v Meyers & Spencer, LLP, 46 AD3d 805; Hansen v Madani, 263 AD2d 881, 883; see also Whelan v Longo, 23 AD3d at 460). [read post]