Search for: "Panetti v. Quarterman" Results 101 - 120 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2007, 8:36 am
Russell - federal appellate procedure Panetti v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 4:51 am
A good satirical piece to start the work week off right. [read post]
28 May 2007, 5:14 pm
"  Here is how the piece starts and ends: In a landmark 8-1 decision, an uncharacteristically subdued Supreme Court ruled "it depends" in the case of Panetti v. [read post]
28 May 2007, 4:06 pm
The Onion published one of its best articles in a while this week with ‘Supreme Court Reaches Landmark ‘It Depends’ Ruling. [read post]
28 May 2007, 2:05 pm
"Supreme Court Reaches Landmark 'It Depends' Ruling": The Onion today provides an article that begins, "In a landmark 8-1 decision, an uncharacteristically subdued Supreme Court ruled 'it depends' in the case of Panetti v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 9:41 pm
Students and faculty in the Capital Punishment Clinic at The University of Texas School of Law assisted in a death penalty case, Panetti v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:39 pm
The transcript of today's argument in Panetti v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
Today at 10 a.m. pacific time, the United States Supreme Court will hear argument in Panetti v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:01 am
After a recess, the Court will return to the bench for an afternoon session at 1 PM to hear one hour of argument in Panetti v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:02 am
In the one-hour oral argument scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. in Panetti v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:10 pm
The Court will hear oral argument tomorrow in No. 06-6407, Panetti v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 4:35 pm
In the one-hour oral argument scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. in Panetti v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
Patty Reinert and Mike Tolson report here on Panetti v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 4:08 pm
I have had a chance to chat with a few reporters about the Supreme Court's upcoming argument in Panetti v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 3:11 pm
The scheduled case for the afternoon, Panetti v. [read post]