Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 6,157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 8:34 am
§ 112, ¶ 2 (112(b)). [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:31 am
” – Regina v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
Moreover, national law can only provide relief in respect of acts performed on the national territory in question (CJEU, IHT Internationale Heiztechnik v Ideal-Standard, case C-9/93, at para. 22). 3. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Friday's California Court of Appeal decision in Norway v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
The text applies to those who hold "civil office under the Authority of the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
And while contextual factors could assist in classifying the measure as a countermeasure (for example, if States meet the requirements of countermeasures), it remains the case that as a default legal views should not be ascribed to States which they have not themselves formulated (Nicaragua, para 266). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm
In Hameed v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
Wiko, para. 4.177; Sisvel v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
La Rose v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm
As the threatened attacks in Rafah have begun, killing untold numbers of civilians, including children, we call on the international community and member states of the UN to act with the utmost urgency to fully ensure respect for the provisional measures ordered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case regarding the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
”[30] The report concluded that “[t]he actions of those who orchestrated the attacks on the Rohingya read as a veritable check-list” of what a State would have done had it “wished to destroy the target group in whole or in part. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm
INTRODUCTION The Supreme Court of Canada recently decided in Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
(Art. 30, para. 1.) [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:10 pm
The CJEU engaged in an almost textbook-like analysis of not only the clear wording of Art. 25 Brussels Ibis, which does not contain any restrictictions whatsoever with regard to an additional connection to the chosen or another Member State (para. 17), but also of the purpose of the Regulation to provide legal certainty requiring that the designated court can easily assess its jurisdiction without recourse to the merits of the case (para. 27). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Here at least the labor specialization of states has produced something quite interesting. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:00 pm
(See Dunlap v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am
D’Amico, 2019 SCC 23, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 394, at para. 3. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
Moving to another state clearly does require some kind of action with the court. [read post]
