Search for: "Paris v. Feder"
Results 101 - 120
of 702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2010, 12:08 pm
Not much new in Numont v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:11 am
From last week's Mississippi Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
Hendrix's portrait is original afterall say Paris Court of Appeal“Last week, the Paris Court of Appeal corrected the Paris Tribunal's interpretation of the originality condition with regard to photographic works. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
Engert, et al v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Google and Twitter Inc., v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 5:10 am
Federal Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2017.htmlDarnell v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 8:28 am
I followed that dispute across multiple jurisdictions and even attended a preliminary injunction hearing in Paris. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 11:58 am
In the leading sovereign debt contracting case of the past half century, NML Capital v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
" <> Turlock Irrigation District v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 4:56 am
Do you love Paris in the Fall? [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Writing for the Paris Review, Josh Friedman previews a new play that centers around an oral argument before the Court. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 10:02 am
By Eric Goldman Doe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:41 am
by Dennis Crouch The first rounds of merits briefs have now been submitted to the Supreme Court in Impression Prods. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:42 am
See Craig v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
Haas v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
Supreme Court decides West Virginia v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:16 am
Supp. 2d 84 http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/320/84/2468802/ (The 'Wondeful World' case )and Acuff Rose Music v Campbell (1994) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campbell_v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
Marcel Pemsel analysed the General Court’s judgment in Apart v EUIPO - S. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 5:06 am
The French Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris has awarded record damages, in the amount to €28,000,000, in the Eli Lilly v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The federal court — indicating that respondent may have violated added requirements to report expenses in excess of $100, to limit hiring at his law firm and restrict support staff to two full-time staff members — referred the matter for prosecution by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Baker v Dorfman, 2006 WL 988747 [SD NY 2006]). [read post]
