Search for: "Parks v. Social Security Administration"
Results 101 - 120
of 237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
That year, the EEOC issued an extensive administrative ruling that reached three conclusions: first, sexual orientation discrimination is a form of gender stereotyping, which the Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:13 pm
Section 1115 of the Social Security Act gives the Secretary of HHS the authority to waive certain statutory requirements for demonstration projects that are likely to promote the objectives of the Medicaid program. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm
On 19 June 2019 HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the case of BVC v EWF. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:43 pm
Wash. 2018) (determining that a hand inspection of all items of a visitor to the Spokane Social Security Administration offices is reasonable and no more intrusive than necessary to further the Government’s legitimate goal in preventing destruction and injury on federal property). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
As the Court observed in the famous New York Times v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Cooperatives: the first social enterprise. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
For instance, in SEC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm
The Social Security Administration’s “Appeals Council” reviews appeals from administrative decisions by individuals seeking disability benefits. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Berryhill, 17-1606, presents a question only a lawyer could love: whether a decision by the Social Security Administration’s “Appeals Council” — the body that hears disability benefits claimants’ appeals from administrative law judge decisions — that the claimant’s appeal was untimely is a “final decision” subject to judicial review. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Gundy v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Daniel O’Connor, Daniel V. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:02 am
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck dissected the Supreme Court’s landmark 1952 decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Department of Homeland Security and U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:56 am
Berryhill (Nov. 7) – Whether, when the Social Security Act provides that a court can award attorney’s fees “not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled,” the 25-percent cap applies only to attorney’s fees for representing a claimant in court or also to fees for representing a claimant before the Social Security Administration. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
The timing suggested that the employer may have investigated its employees’ immigration status because it was unhappy with the results of a union election; as the majority opinion, written by Judge David Tatel, noted, “the company claimed that after the election it put the Social Security numbers given by all the voting employees into the Social Security Administration’s online database and discovered that most of the numbers were either… [read post]
