Search for: "Parris v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2015, 7:28 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s 1985 precedent of Heckler v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 4:33 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
For example, technological attacks against the device similar to the need for DUI breathalyzer devices to be calibrated or otherwise confirmed to be in proper working order may give rise to a new kind of expert witness who may become common in such cases.Moreover, once black-box information is found to be admissible in auto accident personal injury matters, the issue becomes whether a party may assert a spoliation defense against an opposing party for failing to preserve such black-box information… [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Elaborating arguments developed by Larry Tribe, they may insist that only treaties, approved by two-thirds of the Senate, serve as constitutionally appropriate vehicles for such agreements – thereby making it much tougher to get passed into law.To parry this threat, free-market conservatives will emphasize post-New Deal transformations that gave popular legitimacy to this Article one detour around the Treaty Clause, relying on the narrative that David Golove and I provide in a lengthy… [read post]
21 May 2014, 2:26 pm
Bucklew v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:10 pm
Of course that conflicts with, among other things, the Supreme Court’s Gregg v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 10:56 am
The issue in Madigan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:00 pm
United States may hint at a reprise of the al-Kidd pattern. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 10:29 am
You can find the opinion in Coleman v. [read post]
Maryland Court of Appels Upholds Contributory Neligence in Coleman v. Soccer Association of Columbia
9 Jul 2013, 10:12 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals just issued its decision in the Coleman v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:13 pm
Justice Sotomayor parried this by noting other clauses in the compact did not expressly limit diversions to those within a state, yet logically had to be read as being so limited. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:25 am
Furthermore, Article 5 of the 1982 Constitution imposes strict duty for state organs to adhere to constitutional principles:No law or administrative or local rules and regulations shall contravene the [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Bernard (1981) 452 U.S. 89, 103–104 [“[a]lthough we do not decide what standards are mandated by the First Amendment in this kind of case, we do observe that the order involved serious restraints on expression”]; see also Parris v. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
Parris, 2013 U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
In the Times, Matthew Parris complains that Lord Puttnam “has led a sneak attack to sabotage the Defamation Bill and get statutory regulation by the back door“. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
To take one example: in a high-profile 2011 decision, Henry v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:15 am
KF 3469 P37 2011 Equal employment of persons with disabilities : federal and state law, accommodations, and diversity best practices / John Parry. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
”[14] After certification, the union is the one and only party that can bargain for all employees, including those who did not vote for the certification of the union.[15] The extent of this bargaining power is noteworthy: in Falconbridge, the union was assumed to have the power to effectively waive the ESA on behalf of its employees regardless of the individual employees knowledge or consent to such a concession with potential adverse effect on the employees.[16] It is… [read post]
