Search for: "Payne v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
See Graham v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Feds for Medical Freedom, 23-60Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:00 am
Here is the abstract:In the United States Supreme Court, the concept of stare decisis operates as both metadoctrine and doctrine. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:56 am
Thus, in Payne v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
See e.g., Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Payne v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
The Appellate Division, Second Department, recently recognized this governing principle in an analogous case, Payne v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:15 pm
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:57 am
The concept of "victims' rights" was just then broadening its impact upon the criminal justice system, fueled by a United States Supreme Court decision styled Payne v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Payne v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm
Weltover, a breaching party’s failure to make contractually required payments in the United States causes a “direct effect” in the United States triggering the commercial activity exception where the parties’ expectations and course of dealing have established the United States as the place of payment, or only where payment in the United States is unconditionally required by contract. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 1:45 pm
United States, 828 F.2d 759, 764 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:27 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
$500 Fine, Exceeding Forfeiture Amount, Probation Did Not Improperly Penalize Defendant's Trial Right
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 3:30 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm
Ali v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 7:43 am
Of last week’s 16 relists, the court dumped nearly half, including United States Forest Service v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:42 am
On Friday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in Stewart v. [read post]
