Search for: "People v Amen"
Results 101 - 120
of 457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 1:15 pm
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Consequently, the Upper Tribunal would not be amenable to judicial review in cases where “acting within the field ascribed to it, the court perpetrates a legal mistake”. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
Amen to all of that. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 1:53 am
Case EA/2010/0204 Robinson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:45 am
Hryniak and Hryniak v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm
Unlike newspapers or current affairs program, which might be characterised as tabloid or serious-minded, tweets are not amenable to such ready classification. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:16 am
Scott testified that his emails discussed many people within NAPPS or connected to NAPPS and were not directed at Mr. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
At issue was Thames Water’s liability for alleged odours and mosquito infestations affecting people living in properties near the Mogden Sewage Treatment Works in Middlesex. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
At issue was Thames Water’s liability for alleged odours and mosquito infestations affecting people living in properties near the Mogden Sewage Treatment Works in Middlesex. [read post]
[Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review
9 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Sibron v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:37 am
It came after the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:10 am
Comment spam was the example given (amen). [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
There were signs back in 2015 that a Court majority was amenable to the sex discrimination argument. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:50 pm
Gravel v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:15 am
This is a peculiar vision, but Marbury v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:08 am
Schramm v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:34 pm
The upcoming Supreme Court case Acheson Hotels v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
An event that furnishes such speakers, this Kat is pleased to say, is IBC's 6th Annual International Patent Litigation Conference which takes place on 4 and 5 December in the amenable atmosphere of the Melia White House Hotel, London [for some personal reminiscences concerning this venue, see below]. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:49 am
Amen, sister!! [read post]
