Search for: "People v Berkman"
Results 101 - 109
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2007, 2:05 am
Must you "friend" (v., transitive) someone you've only met once? [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 2:51 pm
“Tool Without a Handle”: Tools for Terror; Tools for Peace This blog has addressed principles and challenges in countering odious online content – both content which transgresses the law and content which, while odious, is nonetheless protected free expression.[1] In particular, I’ve touched on regulation of such content, noting principled distinctions between regulation of protected speech and regulation of justifiably restricted content that is illegal even… [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:40 pm
You know, because people are dying left and right from “consuming” unregulated web content. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Disability and Accessibility Jalayne Arias, University of California San Francisco, Alzheimer's Disease in the Workplace: A Framework for Liability Jennifer Bard, University of Cincinnati College of Law, Including People with Disabilities in Federally Conducted, Funded, and Regulated Research Elizabeth Pendo, Saint Louis University School of Law, The Costs of Uncertainty: The DOJ's Stalled Progress on Accessible Medical Equipment Under the ADA Megan Wright, Penn State Law,… [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:36 pm
Circuit’s recent decision in Comcast v. [read post]
