Search for: "People v Bivens"
Results 101 - 120
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
It ruled in Reichle v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
I think I found it (finally) in last month's decision by the Ninth Circuit in Moss v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
Fourth Circuit: It is well established that the Bivens doctrine applies to people named Bivens, not Whitey.Affirmed. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:18 am
If you want to know more about § 1983 and Bivens, see my recent article on the recent Supreme Court case, Minneci v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
There may be Bivens (Bivens v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 5:10 am
All things considered, the defense of QI hasn’t had nearly as great an impact on § 1983 and Bivens cases as many people believe, resulting in the dismissal of only 3.9% of cases. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
Circuit (Hartman) and the Tenth Circuit (Reichle) denied the officials qualified immunity from Bivens damages. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
This is a new context for a Bivens claim. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
Spoons, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 1:07 pm
See Whalen v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
Petitioner Anthony Robinson says that he discovered that people had applied for student loans using his name and forging his signature. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
But in Duamutef v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Ragosta, A Wall Between Secular Government and a Religious People, 26 Roger Williams U. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
He files a Bivens claim. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:48 pm
V. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm
In the first issue, the defendant argued that Trooper Bivens had unlawfully prolonged the traffic stop, invoking the Supreme Court’s decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]