Search for: "People v Branch (Harry)" Results 101 - 120 of 221
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am by Colby Pastre
The purpose of imposing this 3-cents-an-ounce sugar-sweetened beverage tax is to allow people to get their kids educated and move them out of poverty into taxpaying citizens.[4] Consistent with this revenue-centric approach, diet beverages were included in the tax to try to maximize its revenue potential, despite not contributing to caloric intake. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am by SHG
Nor was Brennan, although he was both able and influential, as indeed was Stevens—until he wrote a ridiculous opinion in Clinton v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court justices in the Youngstown steel seizure case faced the question of the emergency authority of the President of the United States, not of the person of Harry S. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Canada The case of Hudspeth v Whatcott 2017 ONSC 1708 concerned a proposed class action on behalf of 500,000 people who marched on the 2016 Pride Toronto Parade. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm by Susan Hennessey, Helen Klein Murillo
Whether Trump’s comments represent an intentional deflection or merely reflect misaligmed priorities, most people can agree without defending leaking that the leaks are probably not the “real scandal” here. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm by Nora Ellingsen
Senator Kamala Harris called out the Executive Order as a Muslim ban on Twitter: On Holocaust Memorial Day, President Trump enacted an executive order that will restrict refugees from Muslim-majority countries. [read post]