Search for: "People v Burke-Wells"
Results 101 - 120
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Dan Burk has a paper on this. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 8:32 am
(Burke v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Bilski et al v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 5:03 pm
Burke for Plaintiff and Respondent. [read post]
29 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Dan Burk: Questions about antitrust. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm
Dan Burk: what are patents supposed to do? [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:51 am
And: Kentucky has executed three people since 1976. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
In Burke v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 9:29 am
Each is targeted at a different group of people. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 9:29 am
Each is targeted at a different group of people. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:27 am
Burke, 2009 U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
(Green Patent Blog) Global - Copyright Conference calls on WIPO to boost support for collective management of copyright and related rights (WIPO) Librarians take the copyright battleground in developing countries (Intellectual Property Watch) Creative Commons study on how people understand the term ‘noncommercial use’ (Creative Commons) Africa Time to follow the example of Nashville? [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 5:23 pm
Burke v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
• Outbreaks have traced back to grass-fed and pastured animals, as well as animals in feedlots. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 5:06 pm
This is a well-written editorial from the New England Journal of Medicine discussing why it is important to preserve people's rights to bring tort actions. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
Among those attending were: Ralph Baxter, CEO of Orrick, who delivered the keynote Friday morning Ted Burke, CEO of Freshfields, who delivered the keynote Thursday morning Stuart Popham, senior partner of Clifford Chance, who spoke after dinner on Thursday Practitioner/panelists included:Richard L. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Politano, No. 06-2342 Sentence above the guidelines range for engaging in a business of dealing firearms without a license is affirmed where the district court: 1) acted well within its discretion in finding defendant's likelihood of recidivism was underestimated in the sentencing guidelines; and 2) properly considered the seriousness of the crime, need for deterrence, and defendant's likelihood of recidivism within its discussion of section 3553(a) sentencing factors. . [read post]
