Search for: "People v Chang"
Results 101 - 120
of 20,143
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
In People v Linzy and People v Blank, it was held that if this distinction between procedural and substantive changes in the law were mechanically applied, there would be no doubt that the repeal of corroboration laws would not be encompassed within the Ex Post Facto Clause, since such laws do not add to the legislatively defined sex crimes, do not alter the elements of existing crimes, do not elevate the punishment for existing crimes and are generally… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
That's a lot of m*****f***ing.First there was People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
The Court of Appeal amends today its earlier opinion (published back in July) to make a couple of substantive changes. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:05 am
Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 6:43 am
" And the NYT apparently changed the headline to appease people who expected a better demonstration of hostility toward Trump.The collective #CancelNYT response to this headline is rather revealing. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:43 pm
Change of plans. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Oddly, not that many people are asking these questions[1] – but it is clear that the Rules overhaul needs to be very drastic in the face of rapidly approaching and unprecedented change. [read post]
28 May 2017, 6:33 am
This past Friday, 26 May 2017, the African Court of Human and Peoples’ Rights handed down its first judgement on the rights of indigenous peoples in the matter of African Commission of Human and Peoples’ Rights v The Republic of Kenya (the Ogiek case). [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:52 am
Denezpi v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:11 am
" Fields v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:00 am
One is a revocable trust, which the owner can change. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:53 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:08 am
The Newfoundland Court of Appeal said Yes in the recent decision in Hickey’s Building Supplies Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 1:06 pm
If 11 people keep asking me hour after hour to explain my view, and I feel like I've done so more than competently, I may well react negatively to them saying things like (as here) "Just tell me yes or no . . . . [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
” The post Government Agencies Are Not People Under AIA in Return Mail Inc v United States Postal Service appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 2:19 pm
It's a misdemeanor offense, so it goes to the Appellate Division, and then the Court of Appeal, which holds -- in an unpublished opinion -- that it's categorically okay for police to follow people into their homes when they're "fleeing', even for minor misdemeanors. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday decided Town of Greece v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 11:02 pm
Are you classifying the people who work for you properly? [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 1:51 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
