Search for: "People v Connors (David)" Results 101 - 120 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The power to make knowledge claims v. the people who have been erased from/made invisible in our narratives. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm by Amy Howe
But in 1992, in a challenge to a Pennsylvania law restricting abortions, Kennedy wrote an unusual joint opinion, along with O’Connor and Justice David Souter, that reaffirmed the “essential holding” of Roe. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
” He alleges it did nothing of the sort, and also contained an ingredient, yohimbe, that is dangerous for some people. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
  Its director Stephen Abell said that the organisation has never been more active or proactive, has high satisfaction rates from the people that use its services and is helping more people than ever before. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
Note: David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses the President and General Counsel of the Institute for Justice, Scott Bullock, one of the nation’s foremost opponents of eminent-domain abuse. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:48 am by SHG
Connor, that enables the police to escape responsibility. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
And finally … David Banks’ blog has a discussion of the reporting restrictions which are likely to affect the reporting of latest plot twist in the Archers. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:49 am
Cozen O'Connor Faces Gender Discrimination Lawsuit The Legal Intelligencer Cozen O'Connor has been hit with a sex discrimination suit by a lawyer who claims she was ousted from the firm less than a month after she filed a formal complaint of gender discrimination with the firm's director of human resources. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:35 pm
"David Souter was shattered" (page 177), so Bush v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Ireland Shop staff asking a customer to show a receipt for goods they have bought in the store does not of itself amount to defamation of character, Judge John O’Connor in the Circuit Civil Court ruled, when he threw out a €75,000 damages claim. [read post]