Search for: "People v Deal"
Results 101 - 120
of 11,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
By contrast, the prosecutor and the defense attorney were fully able to have done what the trial court wanted -- a just and reasonable plea deal -- quickly. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:11 am
Nonetheless, in other ways, the invocation of Brown v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 1:54 pm
” Yesterday, the ACLU filed Gillman v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Gloster v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Gloster v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 8:51 am
However, I’m mostly flummoxed by the weaponization of BIPA against augmented reality, especially tools that bring a great deal of joy to people’s lives like AR filters and effects. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:03 pm
The recent Court of Appeals case, People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:43 am
Hidy v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 1:25 pm
And a favorable deal:"The prosecution charged defendant by felony complaint with oral copulation with a minor. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:47 pm
The person driving the van eventually strikes a deal with prosecutors and testifies against the guy. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:31 pm
The opinion deals with this contention in a single paragraph at the end.On the merits, Justice Lui seems entirely right that any error, even if it existed, would be harmless.But there's no factual background about what evidence what admitted on the credit limit issue, or for what alleged purpose. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 3:00 pm
Robbed and kidnapped someone for the benefit of a gang.But what's the deal with the "John Doe? [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
"What's the deal with the "media contacts" part of that earlier request? [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Seems like that's a pretty big deal. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
And it's technically not part of the crime at all, which was done and over by the time the police found him.But Justice Lui persuasively argues -- to me, anyway -- that the video is relevant to refute defendant's story at trial that he attacked the victim because the victim was a drug-dealing child molester. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
In Correa v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:45 am
When you're dealing with locking up a child for a minimum of 30 years, I think it makes sense to demonstrate some concern. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:08 pm
But I'm not exactly sure why we want to stop people from letting their spouses come here. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Those are not trivial costs either.So the real questions are (1) what the Constitution requires (not what the statute says), (2) what's the best policy, for the individual and/or the state, and (3) which procedure is most efficient; a system that routinely enters mandatory orders that few people will ever pay and that burdens people and the system with their enforcement, or a system that takes into account ability to pay but requires hearings for those defendants… [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
Judges protect that interest when they decide whether or not to approve deals. [read post]
