Search for: "People v Haile" Results 101 - 120 of 437
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2012, 5:01 pm by nflatow
In what is accurately hailed as a game-changing decision for the LGBT community, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled in April (Macy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 12:00 pm by Daniel Evans
In fact, the argument that Congress has the power to mandate that people engage in commerce under the taxing power was, essentially, a Hail Mary argument. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
There are people that may hail this decision as a success, but any ruling that erodes the rights and protections of the people vis-à-vis the United States Constitution, is definitely not a success. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday I reported on a courtroom insanity of potentially pathological proportions in Munich (Nokia v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel Four: Psychology of Online Advertising Moderator: Christopher Wong, Yale ISP Jeff Chester, Center for Digital Democracy All new technologies get hailed as bringing democratization, but there are always multiple impacts. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 6:32 pm
SPECIAL MULTI-PERIL POLICY - WATER DAMAGE EXCLUSION - SINKHOLE COLLAPSE - EFFICIENT PROXIMATE CAUSE Simmons v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:42 am by Sam Favate
In a statement hailing the resolution, the Progressive Caucus of the City Council said that “corporations should not share the same rights as people” and that “the government should regulate the raising and spending of money by corporations intended to influence elections. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:01 am by INFORRM
At its heart, the law is not about protecting data or information – it is about protecting people. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
Levy Case Caption: Bryant, in his capacity as Executor of the Estate of Richard Jewell v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:11 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court heard oral argument in the eagerly anticipated NLRB v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:40 am by Lisa Milam-Perez
Supreme Court heard oral argument Monday in the eagerly anticipated NLRB v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:27 pm by Giles Peaker
The Supreme Court considered that the applicable principles were authoritatively established in the cases of Din v Wandsworth London Borough Council and Haile v Waltham Forest London Borough Council and this was not a case where they needed to be reviewed “even though there may be errors in the reasoning in the Court of Appeal, which should not be treated as authoritative”. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
Monday’s second case is Georgia v. [read post]