Search for: "People v Henry O." Results 101 - 120 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In his book We The Judges (1956), Justice William O. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm by Peter Tillers
O' Hair Professor of Evidence & Procedure, Michigan State University School of Law. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 12:12 am
 On somewhat different topic, I saw this Legal Newsline story by John O'Brien, about Dickie Scruggs receiving a trial subpoena for the McIntosh v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:10 am by Susan Brenner
Code §§ 2252A & 2253, John Henry Ahrndt moved to suppress certain evidence, claiming it was obtained in violation of the 4th Amendment. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
During the reign of England’s Henry VII, there were actually two pretenders. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Lovechilde
  All three of these Reagan justices were in the majority in Bush v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 3:15 pm
The report reveals more than 500 clean water enforcement cases that have been dropped or stalled in the wake of the 2006 decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 A: everybody would require me to prove fair use and I’d need E&O, but the issue then is the expense of creating the iBook and the possibility of it being rejected because of inferior tech. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]